A generation can’t kill creativity. Creativity usually precedes generation. The belief that technology can kill creativity is like demanding that a tree can kill the solar. Creativity is the pressure that drives the era.
What is creativity?
Common definition: potential to produce something new via inventive skill, whether or not a new solution to the trouble, a new approach or tool, or a brand new creative object or form. The time period typically refers to a richness of ideas and originality of thinking. If you can not digest it all that easily, don’t worry. I could not both. There are many definitions of creativity, and they may be all complex and wordy; however, I suppose Einstein stated it nice. “Creativity is seeing what absolutely everyone else has visible and thinking what nobody else has thought.” That’s creativity in a nutshell. (Einstein, quoted in Creativity, Design and Business Performance.)
Perceptions of the creative type
While applied to a human, the term innovative typically provokes the creative kind’s picture: the author, the musician, and the painter, amongst others. And conversely, it’s miles regularly assumed that the engineer, businessman, or scientist isn’t creative, but it may be quite the opposite. In my observation, it is greater regularly than not the successful man or woman who’s innovative, no longer a selected form of the person. When looking at the definition of creativity, you can see that creativity isn’t always the potential to attract well or have long hair; however, the capacity to provide something new, whether or not it’s a tune or a better commercial enterprise version or a safer vehicle. All of those advances come from creative minds.
Creativity is the potential to solve issues uniquely and is not restrained to the humanities. The satisfactory arts are more about self-expression and no longer necessarily hassle solving. In any case, creativity in expression and problem fixing has been significantly more advantageous and unleashed through technology.
Creativity constantly precedes the era.
When man first determined that a sharp stick may want to kill an animal or be used to pick his teeth, he becomes making that soar from looking at being innovative. Someone had to have the concept of using a log as a curler before they clearly used it that way. Then got here the Roller 2.0 or Wheel 1.Zero relying on who you ask. The factor is that the wheel didn’t forestall creativity; creativity gave us the wood wheel, then the wagon wheel, then the bicycle tire, then the auto tire…
The apparent loss of Creativity
You may hear human beings lamenting the loss of creativity. However, that is only a perceived loss of creativity. People love bringing up the abundance of awful books, unoriginal art, crappy movies, and horrible songs found on the Internet. However, they’re wrong. There are extra people expressing creativity these days than ever earlier than in records. Don’t confuse quantity and innovative expression with first-rate. Furthermore, whilst it can appear that the exception of creative output has suffered a severe decline, it hasn’t. There are so many human beings expressing themselves creatively, and we have to get right of entry to all of it, so plainly, there is nothing out there but a mountain of crap. In my revel in there may be substantially extra high-quality creative output to be had than ever before.
Creativity needs thought
We have a lot of that available now. 24 hours an afternoon, we can find notions in the form of books, blogs, pix, films, tune, art, pix, you name it. Inspiration may be essential to creativity. Notwithstanding the wealth of digital thought to be had, this is one location where I can see the chance of creativity being stunted with the aid of technology.
Hands-on experience is crucial to creativity. You cannot thoroughly describe a pounding jungle rain, or the sensation of walking past a deserted residence by myself at night, or the odor of a bathroom at a gas station until you’ve got experienced them. There are such a lot of smells, feelings, sensations, and so on, making you a much higher author that you can not get from sitting in the front of a display screen. The gasoline of artistic creativity is the notion, and the elements for the suggestion are know-how and enjoyment. We have a sizeable amount of understanding at our fingertips. We have to ensure we’ve got lots of real-lifestyles revel in. The loss of notion can decrease creativity. However, that could be a case of era distracting us from the idea’s tactile assets, no longer replacing or destroying creativity.
Will era update the artist?
Technology will now not update the artist (as a minimum, not inside the close to future) or creative types; it, in truth, calls for greater people. A programmer can write greater complicated and subtle code to do many mundane features, even mimicking creativity. Still, that ability to imitate is nothing greater than coded commands, and there’s a restriction to what they can do. Real human creativity can make leaps and jumps and associations that a program can not.
For instance, some packages could take a photo and make it appear to be a hand-sketched portrait, and they could get appear very, very convincing. These applications are high examples of the era and its limits. No count how properly the program, there are nonetheless many choices that a human will make differently. Simultaneously, the computer plows on via sporting out all of its commands inside the identical precise manner each time. What’s being coded is a mechanical procedure, now not creativity. In the case of the cartoon applications, an artist sat with a programmer, and that they studied pictures together. The artist explained to the programmer that he would cartoon or draw them in a certain way given certain aspects and factors of an image. He would possibly explain hundreds of variables and the way they practice to shadow and mild.
The programmer then wrote the code to examine lighting fixtures and darks, contrast, colorations, and even awareness and density of elements. But while a sequence of pictures is fed via it, the program will method the assignment precisely each time while an artist will usually do something exceptional. They are probably in an excellent or awful mood that day, perhaps biased in the direction of eyes and now not lips, or have trouble drawing nostrils, or the photograph inspires a sure response, no longer to say the training and personal heritage of the artist. All contribute to the distinctiveness of the piece.
Creativity is being expanded by era, not stifled.
Photoshop and Word are both pieces of software that make developing massively less difficult and quicker, and characteristic gear can do a number of the mechanical work for us; however, they don’t replace creativity. Just as Leonardo Da Vinci used the best tools and techniques of his day, artists having improved past rubbing dirt and ash on cave walls are also shifting beyond paints and brushes and the use of tablets and contact displays. Technology adjustments, creativity does not.
We are evolving our strategies. I hate to look at the darkroom move the manner of the telephone sales space. I bear in mind working in a dark room, and I cherished the atmosphere. However, that is all private and nostalgic. Besides, there’ll continually be a diehard traditionalist to keep the vintage approaches alive, just as there are people who want to handcraft wooden, leather, and take part in different archaic methods for the satisfaction of it and to preserve the antique approaches alive. I am now not saying it is a terrific element that techniques are dying off, pretty the contrary. I suppose it’s miles crucial for a myriad of motives to hold vintage processes alive. But there are numerous advantages to the evolution of these tactics.